Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 8;2015(2):CD001835. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001835.pub4

UKSAT.

Methods Study design: intention to treat
 Method of randomisation: concealed randomisation using automated telephone/computer
 Concealment of allocation: unblinded
Participants Country: United Kingdom
 Number: 1090
 Sex: men (n = 902) and women (n = 188)
 Age: 60 to 76 years
 Inclusion criteria: asymptomatic (non‐tender) infrarenal aneurysm. Maximum anteroposterior diameter 4.0 cm to 5.5 cm. Fit for elective surgery.
Interventions Treatment: surgery, n = 563 of whom 528 had immediate aneurysm repair; 35 had no elective operation due to death, refusal, etc.
 Control: surveillance, n = 527 of whom 401 had aneurysm repair when they met the criteria listed below.
 Participants assigned to the immediate‐surgery group received standard open repair within 6 weeks after randomisation, while participants assigned to selective surveillance were followed without repair at similar regular intervals (at minimum once every 6 months), and surgery was performed within 6 weeks if: a) the aneurysm reached 5.5 cm; or b) the aneurysm enlarged by a minimum 1.0 cm in 1 year; or c) the aneurysm became tender or symptomatic.
Outcomes Primary: survival during mean follow‐up (range 8 to 12 years, mean 10 years)
 (30‐day surgical mortality)
 Secondary: healthcare costs
Notes The Medical Research Council and the British Heart Foundation supported this trial.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Concealed randomisation using automated telephone/computer
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Concealment of allocation: unblinded
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Cannot blind participants
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Unlikely given the study outcome (mortality) and low lost‐to‐follow‐up rate. Vital status was assessed using the same methodology for both participants in the immediate‐repair group and participants in the routine ultrasound surveillance group‐‐in case misclassification occurred, this would have been non‐differential and its impact on the study results would be limited.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Unlikely given the study outcome (mortality) and low lost‐to‐follow‐up rate
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Authors published findings on all the study outcomes including the study outcome of this review.
Other bias Low risk We did not identify other possible risk of bias.

AAVS: American Association for Vascular Surgery
 SVS: The Society for Vascular Surgery