Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 3;2015(6):CD011398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011398.pub2

Comparison 1. Motivational interviewing versus usual care.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Activities of daily living 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 3‐month 1 411 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.84, 1.23]
1.2 12‐month 1 411 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.89, 1.37]
2 Mood 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 3‐month 1 411 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.36 [1.07, 1.73]
2.2 12‐month 1 411 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.35 [1.05, 1.74]
3 Death 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 3‐month 1 411 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.11, 1.03]
3.2 12‐month 1 411 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.53 [0.28, 1.00]