Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 19;2014(8):CD005098. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005098.pub3

1. Outcomes found in each of the included studies.

STUDY Basha
2010 		Bechtold 2013a Borsos
2008a 		Borsos
2012 		Chesterfield
2007 		Feldmann
2007 		Jackson
2008a 		Lehnen
2011a 		Liu
2009 		Ma
2008 		Maddalone
2010 		Sharma
2012 		Shi 2008 Turkoz 2011a Upadhyay
2008
OUTCOME
Mesial movement of upper first molar yes yes no yes yes yes no no yes no yes yes yes no yes
Residual overjet at the end of treatment no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no
Success/failure of anchorage device yes yes yes no yes yes yes no no no yes no no yes yes
Duration of active treatment no no no yes yes no no no yes no no no no no no
Duration of space closure yes yes no yes no no no no no no no no no no yes
Number of visits no no no no yes no no no no no no no no no no
Patient perception (pain/discomfort) no no no no yes yes no yes no no no no no no no
Acceptability no no no no no yes no no no no no no no no no
Adverse effects no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no
Economic factors no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no

aThese studies compared 2 types of surgical anchorage