Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 5;2013(6):CD010116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010116.pub2

Comparison 1. Occupational therapy versus standard care.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Function in ADL at the end of scheduled follow‐up (Barthel ADL Index score) 1 62 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.39 [‐0.11, 0.90]
2 Global poor outcome (death or a drop in ADL score) at the end of scheduled follow‐up (6 months) 1 62 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.11, 1.01]
3 Function in ADL at the end of intervention (Barthel ADL Index score) 1 62 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.48 [‐0.03, 0.99]
4 Death at the end of scheduled follow‐up 1 62 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.29 [0.09, 0.98]
5 Mobility (Rivermead Mobility Index score) at the end of scheduled follow‐up 1 62 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.14 [‐0.36, 0.64]