Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 16;2010(6):CD006331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006331.pub2

Comparison 1.

Specific treatment for sensory impairment versus no treatment (or with conventional treatment in both study arms): sensory impairment outcome measures

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Kinesthesia: thumb opposition (post intervention) 1 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Kinesthesia: digit flexion (post intervention) 1 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Position sense: digit flexion (post intervention) 1 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Pain (FMA) (post intervention) 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Mean recovery rate of sensation over 6 weeks 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 Combined sensory modalities (FMA sensation = light touch plus position sense) (post intervention) 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected