Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 16;2010(6):CD006331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006331.pub2

Comparison 2.

Specific treatment for sensory impairment versus no treatment (or with conventional treatment in both study arms): upper limb functional use outcome measures

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 FMA: upper limb function 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 FMA: wrist and hand function 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Hand function test 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Recovery rate on modified Motor Assessment Scale over 6 weeks 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Recovery rate of Brunstrom Stage Score over 6 weeks 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected