Methods |
RCT Mobility‐related CCT versus general balance class |
Participants |
59 participants (Group 1 = 28, Group 2 = 31), mean 3.7 years post‐stroke, mean age 67.8 years, able to walk 10 metres independently with or without gait aid |
Interventions |
Group 1: mobility‐related CCT Group 2: stretching and reaching tasks |
Outcomes |
BBS, TUG, ABC, NHP, standing postural reflexes using force platform, self‐reported prospective falls diary |
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Adequate sequence generation? |
Low risk |
Computer‐generated codes |
Allocation concealment? |
Low risk |
Person independent of the study |
Blinding? All outcomes |
Low risk |
All assessors were blinded to group assignment, study design and purpose |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes |
High risk |
Total of 11 lost before post‐intervention testing, another 6 lost before follow‐up No intention‐to‐treat analysis or imputation of missing data |
Free of selective reporting? |
Low risk |
All outcomes reported |
Free of other bias? |
Low risk |
Adequate sample size |