Marigold 2005

Methods	RCT Mobility‐related CCT versus general balance class
Participants	59 participants (Group 1 = 28, Group 2 = 31), mean 3.7 years post‐stroke, mean age 67.8 years, able to walk 10 metres independently with or without gait aid
Interventions	Group 1: mobility‐related CCT Group 2: stretching and reaching tasks
Outcomes	BBS, TUG, ABC, NHP, standing postural reflexes using force platform, self‐reported prospective falls diary
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation?	Low risk	Computer‐generated codes
Allocation concealment?	Low risk	Person independent of the study
Blinding? All outcomes	Low risk	All assessors were blinded to group assignment, study design and purpose
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes	High risk	Total of 11 lost before post‐intervention testing, another 6 lost before follow‐up No intention‐to‐treat analysis or imputation of missing data
Free of selective reporting?	Low risk	All outcomes reported
Free of other bias?	Low risk	Adequate sample size