Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 7;2010(7):CD007513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007513.pub2

Pang 2005

Methods RCT Mobility CCT versus upper limb CCT
Participants 63 participants (Group 1 = 32, Group 2 = 31), mean 5.1 years post‐stroke, mean age 65.3 years, able to walk 10 metres independently with or without gait aids
Interventions Group 1: mobility‐related CCT and fitness training Group 2: upper limb‐related CCT
Outcomes 6mWT, BBS, VO2max, knee extension strength (dynamometer), PASIPD, proximal femur BMD
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Drawing ballots
Allocation concealment? Low risk Ballots drawn by person not involved with enrolment, screening or outcome assessments
Blinding? All outcomes Low risk Research personnel who performed outcome assessments were blinded to group assignment
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes Low risk Similar small amount of missing data across groups Missing data imputed from baseline values and intention‐to‐treat analysis used
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk This study was reported in at least 3 separate papers all including different outcome measures
Free of other bias? Low risk Adequate sample size

6mWT: 6 Minute Walk Test ABC: Activities‐specific Balance and Confidence Scale BBS: Berg Balance Scale BMD: bone mineral density CCT: circuit class therapy ILAS: Iowa Level of Assistance Scale JTHFT: Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test LOS: length of hospital stay MAS: Motor Assessment Scale NHP: Nottingham Health Profile PADS: Physical Activity and Disability Scale PASIPD: Physical Acitivity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities RCT: randomised controlled trial RMI: Rivermead Mobility Index TUG: Timed Up and Go VO2max: maximum oxygen volume