Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Ali 1995 | Not a randomised controlled trial |
Appel 2000 | No relevant outcomes reported |
Beresford 2001 | No relevant outcomes reported |
Blum 2007 | No relevant outcomes reported |
Broekmans 2000 | No relevant outcomes reported |
DASH 1995 | Short term |
Fielding 2005 | Not minimal control |
Fuemmeler 2006 | No relevant outcomes reported |
Havas 2003 | No relevant outcomes reported |
Lehtonen 2010 | Authors were contacted several times for information on the lifestyle intervention used in the study but there was no response. Due to this we have had to assume that the lifestyle intervention for the control group was not minimal and therefore excluded the study. |
Lutz 1999 | No relevant outcomes reported |
Nomikos 2007 | No relevant outcomes reported |
Porrini 2011 | Ongoing trial. Period of follow‐up less than 3 months |
Rock 2001 | No relevant outcomes reported |
Singh 1992 | BMJ claims fraudulent data. http://www.bmj.com/content/suppl/2005/07/28/331.7511.281.DC1 |
Sorensen 1999 | No relevant outcomes reported |
Staten 2004 | Multifactorial intervention |
Steptoe 2004 | Not minimal control |
Svetkey 2003 | Multifactorial intervention and includes weight loss |
Takai 2003 | Not minimal control |
Thomson 2011 | Ongoing trial. Period of follow‐up less than 3 months |
Verlangieri 1985 | Not a randomised controlled trial |
WHI | Multifactorial intervention |
Winham 2007 | Not minimal control |