Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 16;2016(11):CD009178. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009178.pub3

Summary of findings 2. Trazodone compared to placebo for sleep disturbances in dementia.

Trazodone compared to placebo for sleep disturbances in dementia
Patient or population: sleep disturbances in dementia
 Setting: community
 Intervention: trazodone
 Comparison: placebo
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with placebo Risk with trazodone
Total nocturnal sleep time
 assessed with: actigraphy
 follow‐up: 2 weeks The mean total nocturnal sleep time in the placebo group was 281.9 minutes The total nocturnal sleep time was, on average, 42.5 minutes more in the trazodone group (0.9 more to 84 more) 30
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 2  
Nocturnal time awake after sleep onset
 assessed with: actigraphy
 follow‐up: 2 weeks The mean nocturnal time awake after sleep onset in the placebo group was 203.4 minutes The nocturnal time awake after sleep onset was, on average, 20.41 minutes less in the trazodone group (60.4 less to 19.6 more) 30
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 2  
Number of nocturnal awakenings
 assessed with: actigraphy
 follow‐up: 2 weeks The mean number of nocturnal awakenings in the placebo group was 26 The number of nocturnal awakenings was, on average, 3.71 fewer in the trazodone group (8.2 fewer to 0.8 more) 30
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 2  
Daytime total sleep time
 assessed with: actigraphy
 follow‐up: 2 weeks The mean daytime total sleep time in the placebo group was 144.7 minutes The daytime total sleep time was, on average, 5.12 minutes more in the trazodone group (28.2 fewer to 38.4 more) 30
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 2 Ratio of daytime to night‐time sleep not measured in this study. Total daytime sleep time included as an alternative measure of daytime somnolence.
Reporting at least one adverse event
 assessed with: spontaneous patient/carer report
 follow‐up: 2 weeks Assumed risk for the placebo group was
40 per 100
Comparative risk for the trazodone group was
27 per 100
 (9 to 76)
RR 0.67
 (0.23 to 1.89) 30
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 2 All adverse events were described as mild.
Cognitive function
 assessed with: MMSE
 Scale from: 0 (worse) to 30
 follow‐up: 2 weeks The mean MMSE score in the placebo group was 10.5 The mean MMSE score was, on average, 0.1 higher in the trazodone group
 (0.9 lower to 1.1 higher) 30
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1 Minimum clinically important difference is uncertain, but has been estimated at 1.4 points in moderate‐to‐severe AD (Howard 2011).
Caregiver burden ‐ not measured Not measured  
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; OR: Odds ratio;
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Single small study

2 95% CI includes no effect and effect likely to be of clinical importance.