Study ID |
Reason for exclusion |
Alberti 2001 |
Study design |
Azer 1971 |
Setting |
Baird 1969 |
Outcomes |
Bodey 1969 |
Study design (no control) |
Bodey 1971 |
Study design (matched pairs) |
Choctaw 1984 |
Policy confound (sterile versus clean attire) |
Chow 2005 |
Study design (computer modelling) |
Dekker 1994 |
Confounding |
Demling 1978 |
Patients‐ mix of adults and children, data inseparable |
Freireich 1975 |
Preliminary report of Rodriguez 1978; policy confound |
Friberg 1999 |
Sham operations |
Friberg 2003 |
One patient health‐related outcome reported (surgical site infections), but not enough detail on how it was assessed or if it was noted on an 'ad hoc' basis. |
Gundermann 1974 |
Not patient outcomes |
Lai 2001 |
Study design |
Legg 1970 |
Not patient outcomes; test scenario |
Lidwell 1969 |
Not patient outcomes; test scenario |
Lidwell 1975 |
Study design |
Lidwell 1982 |
Some relevant subgroups within study however cannot separate data (number of re‐operations in each subgroup). Additionally, there are discrepancies in reporting with Lidwell 1984 with 185 patients switching subgroups. |
Lidwell 1984 |
Same study as Lidwell 1982. Non‐transparant reporting of findings‐ data not usable. Discrepancies between Lidwell 1982 and Lidwell 1984. |
Lowbury 1971 |
Population‐ age |
Lowbury 1978 |
Preliminary report of Lidwell 1982 and Lidwell 1984
|
May 1984 |
Study design |
Passweg 1998 |
Retrospective study; population (age) |
Petersen 1987 |
Policy (decontamination) changes |
Qian 2006 |
Mock setting |
Rodriguez 1978 |
Policy confounding |
Schimpff 1975 |
Policy confounding |
Sherertz 1987 |
Study design |
Steingold 1963 |
Study design |
Whyte 1968 |
Not patient outcomes |
Yates 1973 |
Policy confounding |