Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005315.pub2

Cooke 2005.

Methods  
Participants  
Interventions  
Outcomes  
Notes See Table 8
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "A computer‐generated list was used for permuted block random assignment"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "A biostatistician and research assistant who did not participate in data collection conducted the randomization procedures and prepared sequentially numbered sealed envelopes containing the random assignment for each consenting patient"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Subjective outcomes High risk Patients aware of group allocation.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Objective outcomes Unclear risk Study did not address objective outcomes.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "there were no drop‐outs"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unknown if selective outcome reporting.
Protection from contamination? Low risk Interventions administered on an individual basis.