Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005315.pub2

Ganidagli 2005.

Methods  
Participants  
Interventions  
Outcomes  
Notes See Table 8
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "they were assigned, using a table of random numbers"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Study did not address subjective outcomes.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Objective outcomes Low risk All patients wore headphones. "no hospital personnel were allowed to communicate with the patient. [...] scores were measured [...] by a blinded observer. To test observer blinding, the observer was asked whether he recognized the patient's group at any stage during the study period. [...] four patients were excluded because of failure in observer blinding after a technical problem."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk "Four patients (three in the music and one in the control group) were excluded from the study because of technical problems related to the music player." Missing data not described.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unknown if selective outcome reporting.
Protection from contamination? Low risk Interventions administered on an individual basis.