Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005315.pub2

Ikonomidou 2004.

Methods  
Participants  
Interventions  
Outcomes  
Notes See Table 8
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "The patients were assigned randomly." Method of randomisation not described.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Subjective outcomes High risk Patients aware of group allocation.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Objective outcomes Low risk "The CDs were unmarked, and the content was unknown to the nurse starting the CD player. [...] All were told [...] that the investigators were to remain blinded as to which CD was used. [...] HR, noninvasive BP, mid RR were measured by an attending nurse who was unaware of the CD's content."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "Five patients ‐ three from M group and two from C group ‐ were excluded from the calculations because of extended surgery or various technical problems on the ward"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Reports systolic blood pressure but not diastolic blood pressure.
Protection from contamination? Low risk Interventions administered on an individual basis.