Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006075. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006075.pub2

Green 2002.

Methods RCT with no treatment control group 
 Participants were randomised to groups using a random numbers table and 4‐length permuted blocks 
 Exp = 85; Ctl = 85 
 Participants and treating therapists were not blind 
 Evaluator was blind at 0 and 3 months, not blind for 6 and 9 months
Participants Number of participants = 170 
 50+ years 
 Stroke > 1 year ago 
 Mobility problems (slow speed, needed assistive device, having fallen within past 3 months, unable to manage stairs independently) 
 Excluded patients with dementia, other gait problems, severe comorbidities, PT in past 6 months 
 Living at home
Interventions Variable, at least 3 visits, up to 13 weeks 
 Community PT 
 Problem‐solving approach 
 Main interventions were gait re‐education, therapeutic exercise, functional exercise, balance re‐education 
 The control group got no treatment 
 Interventions and outcome measures done in the participants' homes
Outcomes Gait speed (10 metres) 
 RMI 
 BI ‐ locomotion score 
 Outcomes measured at 0, 3, 6, 9 months
Notes Did extensive assessment at baseline 
 Intervention varied by participant 
 Bradford, UK
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate