Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006075. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006075.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Ada 2003 The intervention included more than 50% training on the treadmill, so that overground gait training was not a majority of the treatment
Andersen 2000 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months
Caldwell 2000 Not a RCT (case series with 1 or 2 participants per group)
Ceceli 1996 The intervention included high‐technology equipment not readily available in a community PT setting
Chen 2006 The intervention included numerous components and overground gait training was only one of them, less than 50% of the total
DePaul 2007 Some participants had a stroke within previous 6 months 
 All groups participated in walking exercises
Dickstein 1986 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months
Duncan 2003 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months
Duncan 2007 Not a RCT (protocol for a RCT; intervention used body weight supported treadmill training, not overground gait training)
Eich 2004 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months 
 All groups participated in walking exercises
Flansbjer 2008 Experimental intervention consisted of strength training and stretching; did not include overground gait training
Ford 2007 Not a RCT (no control group)
GAPS 2004 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months 
 All groups participated in walking exercises
Green 2004 This study combined the results of two other studies
Hesse 1994 Not a RCT (single group repeated measures design)
Hesse 1995 Not a RCT (single group repeated measures design)
Hesse 1998 Not a RCT (single group repeated measures design)
Hesse 1999 Not a RCT (single group repeated measures design)
Hesse 2001 Not a RCT (survey design)
Hesse 2003 Not a RCT (review)
Hesse 2005 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months 
 All groups participated in walking exercises
Horn 2005 Not a RCT (cohort design)
Ivey 2007 Experimental intervention was a fitness programme and did not include overground gait training 
 Measured physiological variables such as insulin response and glucose tolerance
Kalra 1993 Intervention was placement into stroke unit or general hospital setting, not a specific therapeutic protocol
Kilbreath 2006 Not a RCT (repeated measures cohort design)
Kilbreath 2006b Intervention included high‐technology equipment not readily available in a community PT setting
Kollen 2005 Not a RCT (cohort design)
Kwakkel 1999 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months
Kwakkel 2002 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months
Langhammer 2000 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months 
 All groups participated in walking exercises
Langhammer 2007 All groups participated in walking exercises 
 The experimental treatment was focused on high intensity exercise for endurance, strength, and balance rather than on overground gait training per se 
 The control group received functional task‐oriented training during the first 3 months and standard PT treatment for the remaining 9 months as needed
Langhammer 2008 Participants had acute stroke
Latham 2005 Not a RCT (survey design)
Laufer 2001 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months 
 The control group participated in walking exercises
Lee 2008 Intervention consisted of progressive resistance training or aerobic cycling, not overground gait training
Lennon 2006 Participant had acute stroke 
 No control group
Liston 2000 Not a RCT (single group cross‐over trial)
Logigian 1983 Included only participants with acute stroke 
 The control group participated in walking exercises
Luft 2008 All groups participated in walking exercises
Lynch 2007 Intervention consisted of sensory retraining, not overground gait training
Macko 2005 All groups participated in walking exercises
Mandel 1990 Intervention for experimental group included high‐technology equipment not available in a typical community PT setting
Mauritz 2004 Not a RCT (review paper)
Mayr 2007 All but one participant had a stroke less than 6 months prior to the study beginning 
 Both groups received physical therapy gait training
McClellan 2004 The experimental treatment was primarily a home exercise programme
Mead 2007 The experimental treatment focused on progressive endurance and resistance training and did not involve overground gait training
Montoya 1994 Intervention for experimental group included high technology equipment not available in a typical community PT setting
Morris 1992 Intervention for experimental group included high technology equipment not available in a typical community PT setting
Olney 1991 Not a RCT (review paper)
Olney 2006 The experimental treatment provided strength and conditioning training rather than a overground gait training 
 The control group participated in walking exercises at home
Peurala 2007 Not a RCT (cohort design)
Plummer 2007 Not a RCT (feasibility study with 7 participants)
Pohl 2002 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months 
 All groups participated in walking exercises
Pohl 2007 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months 
 All groups participated in walking exercises
Pyoria 2007 The control group received overground physical therapy treatment and thus included a substantial amount of gait training
Rimmer 2000 The experimental treatment provided strength and conditioning training rather than providing overground gait training
Rodriquez 1996 Not a RCT (case series)
Roerdink 2007 Not a RCT (compared stroke patients to healthy controls)
Schauer 2003 The intervention included high‐technology equipment not readily available in a community PT setting
Smith 1981 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months 
 The experimental treatment compared placement into a stroke unit or a general medical unit
Smith 1982 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months 
 The experimental treatment compared placement into a stroke unit or a general medical unit
Stephenson 2000 Not a RCT (survey study)
Stern 1970 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months
Stibrant Sunnerhagen 2007 Experimental intervention focused on muscle strengthening and muscle endurance using a circuit training methods, and did not involve overground gait training 
 Measured physiological variables like oxygen consumption and muscle enzymes
Sullivan 2007 All 3 interventions included high‐technology equipment (body weight supported treadmill training) not readily available in a community PT setting
Sutbeyaz 2007 Both groups performed ankle dorsiflexion movements, not overground gait training
Tangeman 1990 Not a RCT (single group repeated measures design)
Teixeira 1999 The experimental treatment was a strength and conditioning programme rather overground gait training
Teixeira 2001 Not a RCT (single group repeated measures design)
Thaut 1997 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months 
 Neither group acted as a non‐gait control group
Treger 2004 The experimental treatment was a home‐based walking programme rather than gait training
van Vliet 2005 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months
Waagfjord 1990 Not a RCT (case series)
Wagenaar 1990 Not a RCT (case series)
Weng 2006 Neither group acted as a non‐gait control group
Werner 1996 The experimental treatment included 50% OT and 50% PT 
 Of the PT services, gait training accounted for only a portion 
 Thus, overall, gait training did not account for 50% of the experimental treatment
Werner 2007 Not a RCT (cohort design)
Wolfe 2000 The experimental treatment was home‐based intervention by a rehabilitation team 
 Fewer than 50% of the participants received gait training or physical therapy services
Yang 2005 All groups participated in walking exercises
Yavuzer 2007 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months, and the experimental treatment did not consist of overground gait training
Yen 2008 No non‐gait control group 
 Both groups received general physical therapy
Young 1992 Participants had a stroke within previous 6 months

OT: occupational therapy 
 PT: physical therapy 
 RCT: randomised controlled trial