Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 21;2016(3):CD009645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub3

NCT00853866.

Trial name or title Enhancement of motor function with reboxetine and transcranial direct current stimulation (STIMBOX)
Methods Randomised sham‐controlled double‐blind cross‐over trial
Participants 12 people with stroke between 18 and 86 years of age, able to give informed consent, with first‐ever ischaemic stroke at least 6 months before study enrolment and paresis of arm/hand muscles above 3 on MRC scale
 
Exclusion criteria: multiple cerebral lesions with associated residual deficits, severe head trauma, seizures, ferromagnetic implants in the head/neck region, pacemaker, other psychiatric or neurological diseases, substance abuse, inability to give informed consent, contraindications for reboxetine (seizures, glaucoma, prostate hyperplasia with urinary retention, cardiac arrhythmias, potential interactions with comedication), pregnancy and breast‐feeding
Interventions Experimental group 1: reboxetine + active tDCS: single dose of reboxetine/edrona × 4 mg 80 minutes before assessment of JTT + 20 minutes of 1 mA tDCS during JTFHT assessment with the active electrode over M1 of the lesioned hemisphere 
Experimental group 2: reboxetine + sham tDCS: single dose of reboxetine/edrona × 4 mg 80 minutes before assessment of JTT + 30 seconds of 1 mA tDCS during JTFHT assessment with the active electrode over M1 of the lesioned hemisphere
Experimental group 3: placebo drug + active tDCS: placebo 80 minutes before assessment of JTT + 20 minutes of 1 mA tDCS during JTFHT assessment with the active electrode over M1 of the lesioned hemisphere
Experimental group 4: placebo drug + sham tDCS: placebo 80 minutes before assessment of JTT + 30 s of 1 mA tDCS during JTFHT assessment with the active electrode over M1of the lesioned hemisphere
Outcomes Primary outcome measures: Jebsen Taylor Test at 4 different sessions with 4 different interventions
Secondary outcome measures: maximum grip force at 4 different sessions with 4 different interventions; Nine‐Hole Peg Test at 4 different sessions with 4 different interventions
Starting date January 2009
Contact information Contact: GianpieroLiuzzi, MD
+49 40 7410 ext 59278
g.liuzzi@uke.de
Contact: Christian Gerloff, MD
+ 49 40 7410 ext 53770
gerloff@uke.de
Notes Last updated: 1 December 2010