Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 11;2015(3):CD008226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008226.pub3

Chu 2006c.

Methods 4‐Week dietary stabilisation period
3‐Month before‐and‐after study
Participants 32 men and women with hypercholesterolaemia; TC > 200 mg/dL (5.17 mmol/L), LDL‐C > 130 mg/dL (3.36 mmol/L)
Exclusion criteria: any acute illness, leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, chronic inflammatory disease, connective tissue disease, individuals with ACS within 6 months of enrolment
Baseline TC: 6.60 mmol/L (255 mg/dL)
 Baseline LDL‐C: 4.61 mmol/L (178 mg/dL)
 Baseline HDL‐C: 1.09 mmol/L (42 mg/dL)
 Baseline TG: 1.76 mmol/L (156 mg/dL)
Interventions Atorvastatin 10 mg/d
Outcomes Per cent change from baseline at 3 months of serum TC, LDL‐C, HDL‐C and TG
Notes SDs were imputed
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Atorvastatin 10 mg/d; intervention was analysed, and as no placebo group was included for comparison, assessment of random sequence generation is not applicable
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Atorvastatin 10 mg/d; intervention was analysed, and as no placebo group was included for comparison, assessment of allocation concealment is not applicable
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Atorvastatin 10 mg/d; intervention was analysed, and as no placebo group was included for comparison, blinding status is not applicable
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Data on all participants were reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All lipid parameters were measured
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias