PAPAGO‐T 2013.
Methods | 4‐Week dietary lead‐in period 12‐Week randomised double‐blind study |
|
Participants | 225 men and women aged 20 or older with LDL‐C > 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) with hypercholesterolaemia with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus HDL‐C < 40 mg/dL (1.03 mmol/L) Exclusion criteria: statin hypersensitivity, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, pregnancy, possible pregnancy or breastfeeding, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus 113 participants received atorvastatin 112 participants received pitavastatin Atorvastatin 10 mg/d baseline TC: 5.53 mmol/L (214 mg/dL) Atorvastatin 10 mg/d baseline LDL‐C: 3.91 mmol/L (151 mg/dL) Atorvastatin 10 mg/d baseline HDL‐C: 1.25 mmol/L (48 mg/dL) Atorvastatin 10 mg/d baseline TG: 1.73 mmol/L (153 mg/dL) |
|
Interventions | Atorvastatin 10 mg/d Pitavastatin 2 mg/d |
|
Outcomes | Per cent change from baseline at 12 weeks of serum TC, LDL‐C, HDL‐C and TG | |
Notes | Atorvastatin 10 mg/d treatment arm was analysed | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Atorvastatin 10 mg/d; treatment arm was analysed, and as no placebo group was included for comparison, assessment of random sequence generation is not applicable |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Atorvastatin 10 mg/d; treatment arm was analysed, and as no placebo group was included for comparison, assessment of allocation concealment is not applicable |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Atorvastatin 10 mg/d; treatment arm was analysed, and as no placebo group was included for comparison, blinding status is not applicable |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants were included in the efficacy analysis |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All lipid parameters were included in the efficacy analysis |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Kowa Ltd funded the trial |