Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 11;2015(3):CD008226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008226.pub3

Tekin 2004.

Methods ≥ 6‐Week dietary stabilisation period
3‐Month before‐and‐after study
Participants 38 men and women with hyperlipidaemia and CHD; LDL‐C > 135 mg/dL (3.49 mmol/L), TG < 300 mg/dL (3.39 mmol/L)
Exclusion criteria: unstable angina pectoris, MI, stroke, coronary angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, major surgery, anti‐inflammatory medication or anticoagulant usage before 6 months of study, cancer; liver, kidney or thyroid disease; SBP/DBP > 160/100 mmHg
Baseline TC: 5.61 mmol/L (217 mg/dL)
 Baseline LDL‐C: 4.09 mmol/L (158 mg/dL)
 Baseline HDL‐C: 0.93 mmol/L (36 mg/dL)
 Baseline TG: 1.76 mmol/L (156 mg/dL)
Interventions Atorvastatin 10 mg/d
Outcomes Per cent change from baseline at 3 months of serum TC, LDL‐C, HDL‐C and TG
Notes SDs were imputed
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Atorvastatin 10 mg/d; intervention was analysed, and as no placebo group was included for comparison, assessment of random sequence generation is not applicable
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Atorvastatin 10 mg/d; intervention was analysed, and as no placebo group was included for comparison, assessment of allocation concealment is not applicable
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Atorvastatin 10 mg/d; intervention was analysed, and as no placebo group was included for comparison, blinding status is not applicable
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Data on all participants were reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All lipid parameters were measured
Other bias High risk Pfizer funded the study; data may support bias for atorvastatin