Kwon 2007.
Methods | Method of randomisation: block randomisation (no other information) Assessor blinding: no blinding but independent assessment of clinical and radiological outcome measures Loss to follow‐up:
|
|
Participants | Country: Canada, at the Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia Period of study recruitment: between 1998 and 2003 Total number: 42 participants
Age
Gender
|
|
Interventions | Reduction was performed during the surgical procedure 1. Anterior procedure: anterior cervical discectomy + tricortical iliac crest autograft + plate fixation 2. Posterior procedure: lateral mass screw‐plate fixation and/or interspinous and/or oblique wiring Postoperative care: self‐controlled analgesia device provided to the participants; all mobilised with cervical orthoses (Guildford, Inc.) and were trained by occupational therapists in brace application. Standard physiotherapy regimen. Outpatient physiotherapy was not routine. |
|
Outcomes | Length of follow‐up: 12 months Pain: 1st and 2nd postoperative days Clinical and radiographical outcomes: 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively Primary outcome
Secondary outcomes
|
|
Notes | The study population included the following types of unilateral facet injuries:
Ten participants had single nerve root injury: 6 (anterior) versus 4 (posterior) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details: "The patients were randomised according to a block randomisation procedure" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding for participants or treatment providers |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No blinding. "Independent research assistants not involved in the patients’ clinical care administered all clinical outcome measures". |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | All participants lost to follow‐up or excluded were reported. However, their data were not presented. For patient‐reported outcomes:
For radiographic outcomes:
|
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All the outcomes described in the methods section were presented in the results |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Different types of instrumentation were used in both groups, especially in the posterior fixation group, in which lateral mass screws with plates and/or interspinous and/or oblique wiring were deployed. |