Newburger 2007.
Methods | Multicentre (8 centres in North America), randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. December 2002 to December 2004 |
|
Participants | All participants between day 4 and day 10 of illness Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
589 children identified. 276 were ineligible (185 met at least 1 exclusion criterion. 95 did not meet inclusion criteria) 313 considered eligible, of these 199 parents granted consent 199 children randomised Treatment: 101 participants Control: 98 participants No significant differences between groups at baseline randomisation |
|
Interventions |
Control:
Treatment:
If children had recurrent fever > 36 h after the initial infusion (and no alternative source was found) then a further dose of IVIG 2 mg/kg, then if they remained pyrexial after a further 36 h another dose of IVIG 2 mg/kg was administered |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcome:
Secondary outcomes:
|
|
Notes | ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00132080 Funding: National Institutes of Health and Higgins Family Cardiology Research Fund No relevant potential conflict of interest reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "Randomly assigned" with use of "dynamic balancing" at each centre Comment: no information of what "dynamic balancing" entailed |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated Comment: impossible to know if participants or physicians were blinded to the allocation |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "double blind" Comment: appears adequate |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "double blind" Comment: appears adequate |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "Interim analysis reviewed by an independent data and safety monitoring board." Data excluded for "6 patients who were discovered to have met an exclusion criteria, for 2 patients who did not receive IV steroid despite randomisation into this group, and 8 patients who were enrolled because they had coronary abnormalities but did not meet the classic criteria for KD." |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Pre‐trial protocol published on ClinicalTrials.gov and consistent with methodology and results published |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified |