Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;2016(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub7

Comparison 13.

Sensitivity analysis

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 ITT treatment vs per protocol control 28 12422 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.79 [1.65, 1.94]
2 Continuous abstinence at 9 ‐ 12 weeks 24 12339 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.49 [2.33, 2.65]
3 Continuous abstinence at 24 weeks 26 14016 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.44 [2.26, 2.63]