Methods | Country: 37 centres in 8 countries: USA (8), Australia (4), Belgium (4), Canada (4), Czech Republic (4), France (3), Germany (5), UK (5) Setting: Clinics, hospitals, academic research centres Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of retreatment with varenicline in smokers who had taken varenicline for ≥ 2 weeks in a previous smoking cessation attempt Study Design: Double‐blind placebo‐controlled multinational RCT Dates conducted: December 2010 ‐ November 2012 Analysis: "A sample size of 490 participants randomized to varenicline or placebo in a 1:1 ratio was estimated to provide ≥90% power for a comparison of varenicline vs. placebo using a two‐group continuity corrected two‐sided χ² test at the 0.05 significance level for the primary end point (CAR for weeks 9–12), assuming an OR of 3.36 with a placebo CAR of 12% and a varenicline CAR of 31%. It was also estimated to provide 80% power for the treatment comparison in the key secondary end point (CAR for weeks 9–52) for an OR of at least 2.55 with a 6% CAR in the placebo group and 14% in the varenicline group." |
|
Participants | 498 adult smokers (varenicline 251, placebo 247) with previous use of 2+ wks of varenicline at least 3m prior to screening, aged 18+, CPD 10+, motivated to quit. Mean age 47.5, 50.4% women, 93% white, mean CPD 20.5, mean FTND 5.5 | |
Interventions | 1. Varenicline 12 wks, titrated in 1st wk, 1 mg x 2/day 2. Placebo, identical regimen Brief (< 10 mins) counselling at each contact. TQD set for wk 1 visit. Clinic visits at wks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12; 13, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 52. Brief phone calls at wks 5, 7, 14, 20, 36, 44. Dosage could be halved if intolerable |
|
Outcomes | Primary: CAR at wks 9 ‐ 12, 9 ‐ 52 Secondary: CAR at wks 9 ‐ 24; 7‐day PPA at wks 12, 24, 52 Validation: CO < 10 ppm |
|
Treatment type | Medication: VARENICLINE | |
Notes | New for 2016 update Funding: Pfizer |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive either varenicline or placebo at a 1:1 ratio for 12 weeks of drug treatment using computer‐generated block randomization within each site" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Losses to follow‐up fully reported. ITT analyses conducted |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | None noted |
Other bias | Low risk | None noted |