Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;2016(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub7

Oncken 2006

Methods Country: USA Setting: 10 research centres Aim: To evaluate efficacy and safety of 4 varenicline dose regimens
Dates conducted: Not stated Study Design: Phase 2 double‐blind placebo‐controlled RCT Analysis: Power calculation (90%, 2‐tailed, alpha = 0.05); Logistic regression with treatment and centre as independent variables. Likelihood ratio Chi² statistic
Participants 647 healthy volunteer smokers, aged 18 ‐ 65, smoking at least 10 CPD. 49.5% men, 80% white, av CPD 21, mean FTND 5.5. Allocated to group 1 (129), group 2 (130), group 3 (129), group 4 (130) or placebo (129) Exclusion criteria: Standard pharmacotherapy trial criteria, + use of NRT or bupropion within last 3m; use of marijuana or tobacco other than cigarettes with last month.
Interventions 1. 0.5 mg nontitrated (2/day for 12 wks) 2. 0.5 mg titrated (wk1 1/day, wks 2 ‐ 12 2/day) 3. 1.0 mg nontitrated (2/day for 12 wks) 4. 1.0 mg titrated (0.5 mg 1/day for 3 days, 0.5 mg 2/day for 4 days, 1.0 mg 2/day wks 2 ‐ 12) 5. placebo tablets 2/d 12 wks All groups received self‐help booklet at baseline, + brief (≤ 10 mins) counselling at weekly clinic visits throughout treatment phase, and phone call 3 days post‐TQD. At each visit smoking status reported and CO verified; vital signs, weight and adverse events. Urine, blood tests and ECGs at screening, baseline, wks 1, 2, 4, 7 and 12. Follow‐up phase: smoking status + CO measured at wks 13, 24, 52; self‐reported status by phone at wks 16, 20, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44
Outcomes Primary outcome: Continuous verified 4‐wk abstinence at wks 4 ‐ 7 and 9 ‐ 12 Secondary outcomes: Continuous verified abstinence at wks 2 ‐ 12 and 9 ‐ 52; 7‐day PPA throughout treatment phase and at wks 12, 24 and 52 Other outcomes: weight change; craving and withdrawal changes using MNWS and mCEQ; adverse events Validation was by expired CO ≤ 10 ppm Cessation analyses were ITT (all participants randomised), while tolerability and safety analyses were based only on those known to have used the intervention drug (N = 627). Attrition was 27% during treatment phase, and 22% of follow‐up consenters lost in follow‐up phase
Treatment type Medication: VARENICLINE
Notes For cessation analyses, titrated and nontitrated results were reported separately and pooled. 24‐wk continuous cessation data supplied by authors The trial was funded by Pfizer Inc
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk "Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 groups"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk "Subjects and investigators were blinded to the study drug treatment [, and] were not encouraged to guess their treatment assignment"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Missing COs or visits OK if confirmed abstinent before and after missed measure
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All expected and predicted outcomes covered
Other bias Unclear risk None noted