Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;2016(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub7

Tonstad 2006

Methods Country: USA (6 centres) and 'international' (18 centres, across Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, UK*) Setting: 24 research centres
Aim: To test the efficacy and safety of extended varenicline treatment for preventing relapse in adults who have quit smoking on open‐label varenicline
Dates conducted: April 2003 ‐ February 2004 (initial recruitment phase) Study Design: Double‐blind placebo‐controlled RCT. Analysis: Power calculation (80%, alpha = 0.05); ITT denominators and logistic regression analysis for binary data, and Kaplan‐Meier curve for time to first lapse
Participants 1210 successful quitters (62.8% of initial cohort) following a 12‐wk open‐label course of varenicline for smoking cessation, randomised to varenicline (603) or placebo (607) for a further 12 wks. 49% men, 97% white, mean age 45, BMI < 15 or > 38 or weight < 45.5 kg, mean CPD 21, mean FTND score 5.4 Exclusion criteria: Standard pharmacotherapy trial criteria, + use of marijuana or tobacco products other than cigarettes within last month; use of NRT, bupropion, clonidine, nortriptyline within last month
Interventions 1. Varenicline 1 mg x 2/day for 11 wks after 1 wk titrated dosage 2. Placebo tablets, same regimen All participants also received brief counselling (≤ 10 mins) at each clinic visit throughout treatment phase (wks 13 ‐ 24). Treatment phase clinic visits were at wks 13, 14, 16, 20 and 24 Follow‐up phase: 5 visits and 4 phone calls from wks 25 ‐ 52
Outcomes Primary outcome: Relapse prevention: maintenance of CO‐validated CAR at 24 wks Secondary outcome: CO‐validated CAR at wk 52; 7‐day PPA at wks 24 and 52. 2 deaths removed from varenicline denominator at 52 wks Other outcomes: weight change, withdrawal symptoms (using MNWS), time to first lapse, adverse events Validation was by expired CO ≤ 10 ppm Dropouts and losses to follow‐up were included in the analyses as continuing smokers (ITT analysis) Attrition was 12% during treatment phase, and 10% of treatment completers lost during follow‐up phase
Treatment type Medication: VARENICLINE
Notes * additional information supplied by author The trial was funded by Pfizer Inc
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "computer‐generated randomization sequence (stratified by center with a block size of 4)"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "a single, centralised [system]"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk "double‐blind treatment phase"; "participant blinding was maintained during this [non‐treatment follow‐up] phase"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Missing COs were considered abstinent if other criteria OK; at wk 52 all criteria had to be met
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All expected and predicted outcomes covered
Other bias Unclear risk None noted