Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;2016(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub7

Williams 2007

Methods Country: USA and Australia Setting: 9 research centres (8 USA, 1 Aus)
Aim: To test the safety of long‐term (12m) use of varenicline in smokers trying to quit Study Design: Double‐blind placebo‐controlled RCT
Dates conducted: October 2003 ‐ March 2005
Participants 377 adult smokers, aged 18 ‐ 75, smoking at least 10 CPD. 49.9% men, 88.6% white, av CPD at baseline 23, mean FTND 5.5 in treatment group, 6.05 in control group. Allocated to varenicline (251) or placebo (126) Exclusion criteria: Standard pharmacotherapy trial criteria, + no use of NRT, antidepressants, antipsychotics, naltrexone during study period.
Interventions 1. Varenicline 1mg x 2/day, titrated for first wk 2. Placebo inactive tablets, same regimen All participants received S‐H booklet Clearing the Air. Brief counselling (≤ 10 mins) at each visit TQD was 1st day of wk 1 visit (7 ‐ 10 days post‐randomisation) Treatment period was 52 wks. Weekly visits throughout wks 1 ‐ 8, then every 4 wks to wk 52, + wk 53 assessment Blood and urine samples taken at screening, baseline, wks 2, 12, 24, 36, 52 (or early termination) Complete physical exam at baseline, wks 24 and 52; BP, pulse and weight measured at all visits, ECG at screening, baseline, wks 2, 24 and 52 (or early termination)
Outcomes Primary outcome: Safety of smokers treated continuously with varenicline over 52 wks, measured at wk 53 by level and tolerability of adverse events and incidence of SAEs Secondary outcome: 7‐day CO‐verified PPA at all clinic visits (expired CO ≤ 10 ppm) Other outcomes: Weight change; changes in vital signs Attrition was 46.2% in varenicline group, 53.2% in control group by end of study
Treatment type Medication: VARENICLINE
Notes This was a safety study, with cessation rates collected as a secondary outcome The trial was funded and conducted by Pfizer Inc In the first version of this review, this trial appeared as Reeves 2006 (unpublished data)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation 2:1 varenicline to placebo. No detailed information reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk No information reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Missing CO and/or visit taken as smokers
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Primary outcome was safety, so minimal cessation data
Other bias Unclear risk None noted