Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD007235. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007235.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Beigi 2005 Compared history‐indicated to ultrasound‐indicated cerclage.
Burwick 2011 Used Cervilenz, which is a plastic instrument to measure the vaginal part of the cervix. This is outside the scope of our review, which focuses on CL measured exclusively by TVU.
Kassanos 2001 Compared history‐indicated to ultrasound‐indicated cerclage.
Lorenz 1990 Control group was not 'no ultrasound' or 'no knowledge', but was manual digital cervical exam. Interestingly, the study group utilized transabdominal ultrasound.
Matijevic 2006 The TVU CL information was blinded and not used for management.
Owen 1999 TVU information was not used for clinical care and no data on outcomes were provided.
Shennan 2007 Compared history‐indicated to ultrasound‐indicated cerclage.
Van Dijken 1991 Control group was not 'no ultrasound' or 'no knowledge', but was manual digital cervical exam. Interestingly, the study group utilized transabdominal ‐ not TVU.

CL: cervical length TVU: transvaginal ultrasound