Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 12;2013(11):CD007529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007529.pub3

Comparison 10.

Doppler ultrasound versus CTG ‐ in diabetes

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Any perinatal death after randomisation (in diabetes) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.1 Singleton pregnancy 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Multiple pregnancy 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.3 Singleton plus multiple pregnancies 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.4 Not specified whether singleton or multiple pregnancies 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Serious neonatal morbidity (in diabetes) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.1 Singleton pregnancy 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Multiple pregnancy 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.3 Singleton plus multiple pregnancies 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.4 Not specified whether singleton or multiple pregnancies 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]