Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan 20;2003(1):CD002925. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002925

Kansas 1998.

Methods Randomised controlled trial. Blocks of 10, random list generated by group assignments before study. Randomisation scheme controlled by a laboratory technician who had no involvement in study. Treatment allocation concealed. Blinded outcome assessor.
Participants USA 
 20 patients 
 10 intervention 
 10 control 
 Mean age 68 years 
 Mean Barthel index score at baseline: intervention group 82.5; control group 82.5. Standard deviation not available. 
 % male not reported 
 WHO definition of stroke 
 Patients recruited when completed acute rehabilitation programme and 30‐90 days after stroke onset. 
 Inclusion criteria: patients between 60 and 90 days poststroke; minimally or moderately impaired sensorimotor funtion (Fugl‐Meyer Motor Score 40‐90), Orpington Prognostic Scale Score 2.0‐5.2); 
 Ambulatory with supervision and/ or assistive device; living at home; living within 50 miles of UKMC. 
 Exclusion criteria: presence of coexisting conditions that would interfere with outcome assessments and/or ability to participate in submaximal exercise programme; score < 18 Mini‐Mental State Examination; receptive aphasia affecting ability to follow three step command.
Interventions Home‐based exercise programme provided by a physical therapist to improve strength, balance and endurance and to encourage use of affected extremity. Each session lasted for 90 minutes, the intervention was prescriptive. Each patient in the treatment group received 3 visits per week for 8 weeks, patients were instructed to continue the exercise programme for a further 4 weeks.
Outcomes Outcomes were recorded at 12 weeks after baseline assessment: 
 Fugl‐Meyer Motor Score: Upper and Lower Extremity 
 Barthel ADL 
 Lawton Instrumental ADL 
 Physical Function (MOS‐36) 
 Gait Velocity 
 6 Minute Walk, ft 
 10m walk 
 Berg Balance Scale 
 Jebsen Test of Hand Function
Notes Follow‐up period used in analyses 12 weeks
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate