Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 26;2016(11):CD009462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009462.pub2

Comparison 2. Adverse events.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 At least one adverse event 5 556 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.44, 1.15]
2 At least one serious adverse event 3 418 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.21 [0.01, 4.43]
3 Myopathy or myotoxicity 3 206 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.03, 3.28]
4 Liver dysfunction 5 551 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.42 [0.27, 7.44]
5 Gastrointestinal symptoms 4 504 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.17 [0.46, 3.00]
6 Sensitivity analysis: at least one adverse event 5 556 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.55, 1.11]
7 Sensitivity analysis: at least one serious adverse event 3 418 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.21 [0.01, 4.41]
8 Sensitivity analysis. Myopathy or myotoxicity 3 206 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.04, 3.16]
9 Sensitivity analysis. Liver disfunction 5 551 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.40 [0.28, 7.15]
10 Sensitivity analysis. Gastrointestinal symptoms 4 504 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.47, 2.87]