Jerosch‐Herold 2011.
Methods | Multi‐centre (5‐centre) UK study Randomised controlled trial Recruitment between October 2007 and January 2009 |
|
Participants | 154 participants 120 male:34 female Mean age: 67.2 years in splint group; 67.5 years in no splint group Inclusion criteria: yes: Patients with Dupuytren’s disease affecting ≥ 1 digit of either hand and requiring fasciectomy or dermofasciectomy were invited to participate. Patients had to be over 18 years of age and competent to give fully informed written consent Exclusion criteria: yes: contracture of the thumb or first webspace |
|
Interventions | Static splint for 3 months postop vs No splint (apart from participants in this group who had a net loss ≥ 15 degrees at the PIPJ and/or a net loss ≥ 20 degrees at the MCPJ of the operated fingers, in which case a splint was given) |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Length of follow‐up: 12 months Low‐quality evidence due to risk of bias and imprecision Funded by Action Medical Research Charity; no conflicts of interest declared |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation process at central site not explained |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central telephone cluster randomisation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Attrition recorded and explained |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Cluster randomisation used in an unblinded study, but unclear it if would have introduced bias |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Patient‐reported outcome measure unblinded but unclear whether likely to be biased; independent observer measured range of motion but unclear whether blinded |