Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 9;2015(12):CD010143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010143.pub2

Jerosch‐Herold 2011.

Methods Multi‐centre (5‐centre) UK study
Randomised controlled trial
Recruitment between October 2007 and January 2009
Participants 154 participants
120 male:34 female
Mean age: 67.2 years in splint group; 67.5 years in no splint group
Inclusion criteria: yes: Patients with Dupuytren’s disease affecting ≥ 1 digit of either hand and requiring fasciectomy or dermofasciectomy were invited to participate. Patients had to be over 18 years of age and competent to give fully informed written consent
Exclusion criteria: yes: contracture of the thumb or first webspace
Interventions Static splint for 3 months postop
vs
No splint (apart from participants in this group who had a net loss ≥ 15 degrees at the PIPJ and/or a net loss ≥ 20 degrees at the MCPJ of the operated fingers, in which case a splint was given)
Outcomes
  • DASH PROM: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

    • No differences between groups

  • Total active extension: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

    • No differences between groups

  • Total active flexion: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

    • No differences between groups

  • Patient satisfaction: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

    • No differences between groups

    • DASH reported by participants; other measurements performed by 2 trained research associates

  • Complications described? no

Notes Length of follow‐up: 12 months
Low‐quality evidence due to risk of bias and imprecision
Funded by Action Medical Research Charity; no conflicts of interest declared
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation process at central site not explained
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Central telephone cluster randomisation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Attrition recorded and explained
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported
Other bias Unclear risk Cluster randomisation used in an unblinded study, but unclear it if would have introduced bias
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Patient‐reported outcome measure unblinded but unclear whether likely to be biased; independent observer measured range of motion but unclear whether blinded