Matsuzaki 2001
| Methods | Prospective cohort study | |
| Participants |
N of patients original cohort: nm; N of patients described study group: 132; N of patients study group of interest: 132; N of patients with liver function tests: 105 Tumour: ALL; Time period diagnosis/treatment: 1984‐1990; Age at diagnosis: nm; Age at follow‐up: nm; F/M%: 42/58a; BMI: nm (one patient with obesity) N of patients hepatitis virus infection: 9/105 (8.6%) HCV infection (not specified) N of patients acute liver disease: nm Follow‐up duration: nm; Completion of follow‐up: 79.5% |
|
| Interventions |
N of patients chemotherapy: 105/105 (100%); Chemotherapy type: vincristine, prednisolone, L‐asparaginase, daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside, methotrexate, 6‐mercaptopurine, enocitabine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone and cyclophosphamidea; Chemotherapy dose: induction consisted of 4 times 2 mg/m2 vincristine, 4 weeks 60 mg/m2 prednisolone, 7 times 10,000 U/m2 L‐asparaginase, 2 times 25 mg/m2 daunorubicin and 4 times 500 mg/m2 cytosine arabinoside. Consolidation consisted of 300 + 400 mg/m2 or 2 times 500 mg/m2 methotrexate, 14 days 120 mg/m2 6‐mercaptopurine and 8 times 150 mg/m2 enocitabine. Reinduction consisted of 4 times 2 mg/m2 vincristine, 2 to 4 weeks 8 mg/m2 dexamethasone, 4 times 1 g/m2 high‐dose cytosine arabinoside and 1 time 10,000 U/m2 L‐asparaginase. Maintenance consisted of 4 days 120 mg/m2 6‐mercaptopurine, 600 mg/m2 intravenous cyclophosphamide, 4 days 70 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide by mouth, 45 mg/m2 daunorubicin, 200 mg/m2 cytosine arabinoside, 4 days 10 mg/m2 methotrexate and 2 mg/m2 vincristinea N of patients radiotherapy involving the liver: 0 (0.0%); Radiotherapy field: not applicable; Radiotherapy dose: not applicable N of patients hepatectomy: nm N of patients BMT: 0 (0.0%) N of patients blood transfusion: nm |
|
| Outcomes | Method of detection of hepatic late adverse effects: transaminase (frequency of testing nm) Definition of hepatic late adverse effects: transaminase <100 IU/L N of patients hepatic late adverse effects at end of follow‐up: 19/105 (18.1%) Risk factors: not evaluated |
|
| Notes | a Data of 187 patients with ALL | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Representative study group | Unclear risk | Unclear if described study group consisted of more than 90% of the original cohort or if it was a random sample with respect to cancer treatment |
| Complete follow‐up assessment | Low risk | Outcome was assessed for more than 60% of the study group of interest |
| Blinded outcome assessor | Unclear risk | Unclear if outcome assessors were blinded to the investigated determinant |
| Well defined study group | Low risk | Type of chemotherapy and number of patients with hepatitis virus infection were mentioned |
| Well defined follow‐up | High risk | Length of follow‐up was not mentioned |
| Well defined outcome | High risk | Outcome definition was not objective and precise |