Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 6;2011(7):CD008205. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008205.pub2

Chotsampancharoen 2009

Methods Prospective cohort study
Participants N of patients original cohort: 205a; N of patients described study group: 133; N of patients study group of interest: 133; N of patients with liver function tests: nm
Tumour: ALL, AML, CML; Time period diagnosis/treatment: 1990‐2005; Age at diagnosis: nm (age at HSCT: mean 9.1 ± 5.6 (0.6‐21.4) yr); Age at follow‐up: nm; F/M%: 46/54; BMI: nm
N of patients hepatitis virus infection: nm
N of patients acute liver disease: nm
Follow‐up duration: mean 5.6 ± 3.5 (1‐15) yr after HSCT; Completion of follow‐up: unclear
Interventions N of patients chemotherapy: nm; Chemotherapy type: nm; Chemotherapy dose: nm
N of patients radiotherapy involving the liver: 127/133 (95.5%); Radiotherapy field: TBI; Radiotherapy dose: 8‐14.4 Gya
N of patients hepatectomy: nm
N of patients BMT: 133/133 (100%)
N of patients blood transfusion: 133/133 (100%)
Outcomes Method of detection of hepatic late adverse effects: ALT, total bilirubin (frequency of testing nm)
Definition of hepatic late adverse effects: nm
N of patients hepatic late adverse effects at end of follow‐up: nm
Risk factors: High serum ferritin (iron overload): serum ferritin was positively correlated with ALT (r=0.17) and total bilirubin (r=0.21) (P<0.001) (Univariate)
Notes a Reported in Leung 2007
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Representative study group High risk Described study group consisted of less than 90% of the original cohort and was no random sample of the original cohort with respect to cancer treatment
Complete follow‐up assessment Unclear risk Unclear if outcome was assessed for more than 60% of the study group of interest
Blinded outcome assessor Unclear risk Unclear if outcome assessors were blinded to the investigated determinant
Adjustment important confounders High risk Important prognostic factors or follow‐up were not taken into account
Well defined study group High risk Number of patients with hepatitis virus infection was not mentioned
Well defined follow‐up Low risk Length of follow‐up was mentioned
Well defined outcome High risk Outcome definition was not objective and precise
Well defined risk estimation Low risk Chi2 was calculated