Nobre 2008
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, single centre, medical ICU in Switzerland | |
| Participants |
Inclusion criteria: suspected severe sepsis or septic shock in the ICU Exclusion criteria: 1. microbiologically documented infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumanni, Listeria spp., Legionella pneumophila, Pneumocystis jiroveci or Mycobacterium tuberculosis, for which a prolonged duration of antibiotic therapy is standard of care (17); 2. severe infections due to viruses or parasites (e.g. haemorrhagic fever, malaria); 3. infectious conditions requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy (e.g. bacterial endocarditis, brain abscess, deep abscesses); 4. antibiotic therapy started 48 hours or more before enrolment; 5. chronic, localised infections (e.g. chronic osteomyelitis); 6. severely immunocompromised patients, such as patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus and with a CD4 count of less than 200 cells/mm³, neutropenic patients (.500 neutrophils/mm³) or patients on immunosuppressive therapy after solid organ transplantation; 7. withholding of life support; or 8. absence of antimicrobial treatment despite clinical suspicion of sepsis Included in this analysis: 52 out of 79 randomised patients: 27 not considered for this analysis due to a diagnosis other than RTI |
|
| Interventions | Guiding antibiotic decisions in ICU patients with repeated measurements Algorithm used in this study: procalcitonin levels measured at baseline and daily. Patients that presenting a favourable clinical course, investigators used pre‐defined “stopping rules” based on circulating procalcitonin levels to encourage caregivers to discontinue ABs. Patients with baseline procalcitonin level greater or equal to 1 µg/L were re‐evaluated at day 5. Investigators encouraged treating physicians to discontinue ABs when: 1. procalcitonin dropped more than 90% from the baseline peak level; or 2. an absolute value below 0.25 µg/L was reached Patients with procalcitonin level below 1 µg/L at baseline were re‐evaluated at day 3 and treating physicians were encouraged to discontinue ABs when procalcitonin level was below 0.1 µg/L and careful clinical evaluation ruled out severe infection |
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
Funding: BRAHMS AG Follow‐up: fixed follow‐up period of 28 days Registration: NCT00250666 |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐based random number generation |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Open‐label trial where physicians knew in which group patients were and where procalcitonin levels were only communicated in the intervention arm |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Non‐blinded study members |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Follow‐up for mortality: 52/52 (100%) |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Outcomes correspond to study protocol |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | 81% adherence to procalcitonin algorithm in procalcitonin group |