Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD002008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002008.pub4

Imes 1988.

Methods Randomised controlled trial. 
 Duration 6 months.
Participants Adults (n = 137, 62 men and 75 women, aged 17.5 ‐ 71.0 years) with Crohn's disease.
CDAI (mean (SD) 110 (96) range 0 ‐ 463).
People taking medication (42% taking prednisolone, 45% salazopyrin) or vitamin supplements (50%) and with active and inactive disease included.
Interventions Monthly dietary counselling sessions aiming to achieve the 'Canadian Recommended Dietary Allowances' (n = 67).
Control group no dietary intervention (n = 70).
Outcomes Energy* and protein intake, vitamin and mineral intake, assessments of clinical condition, survival*, MAMC*, MUAC*, TSF*, hospital admissions*.
Notes Additional outcomes and longer follow up reported in separate papers. 
 Additional data and information on quality obtained from author.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Author cannot recall how the sequence was generated.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Clinical outcomes Low risk Blind assessments of clinical outcomes.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Functional outcomes Unclear risk No functional assessments made.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Nutritional outcomes High risk Assessment of nutritional outcomes not blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Information obtained from the author. 137 participants randomised, 125 completed 6 months of study, 8 drop‐outs in the dietary advice group and 4 in the no dietary advice group. There were no deaths. Reasons for drop‐outs not reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Data on mortality and hospital admissions could not be extracted from the papers and have been obtained from author. Additional outcomes and longer follow‐up reported in separate papers.
Other bias Unclear risk Baseline variables given, advice group were younger and had a lower CDAI that the no advice group.