Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD002008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002008.pub4

McCarthy 1999.

Methods Randomised controlled trial. 
 Duration 4 weeks.
Participants 40 adults (mean (SD) age treatment group 59.6 years (9.6 years), mean (SD) age control group 55.6 years (14 years) beginning a course of curative radiotherapy for stage 1 or 2 cancer.
Nutritional status of participants unclear.
8 participants lost to follow up, 6 in the experimental group and 2 in the control group.
Interventions Weekly nutritional counselling to maintain recommended dietary intake of calories and protein plus 8 oz of 1.0 kcal/ml nutritional supplement (n = 19) versus weekly nutritional counselling (n = 18).
Outcomes Energy intake*.
Notes Data obtained from authors.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Coin toss used to randomise participants.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not discussed.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Clinical outcomes High risk None measured.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Functional outcomes High risk None measured.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Nutritional outcomes High risk Paper states that assessments were made by the nurse and dietitian that implemented the intervention.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 8 participants lost to follow up, 6 in the experimental group and 2 in the control group.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All specified outcomes reported but presented in a figure and so not in a format usable for meta‐analysis. Mean change (SD) in energy intake obtained from authors.
Other bias Unclear risk Baseline variables given, the supplement group weighed less and received less radiotherapy.