McCarthy 1999.
| Methods | Randomised controlled trial. Duration 4 weeks. | |
| Participants | 40 adults (mean (SD) age treatment group 59.6 years (9.6 years), mean (SD) age control group 55.6 years (14 years) beginning a course of curative radiotherapy for stage 1 or 2 cancer. Nutritional status of participants unclear. 8 participants lost to follow up, 6 in the experimental group and 2 in the control group. |
|
| Interventions | Weekly nutritional counselling to maintain recommended dietary intake of calories and protein plus 8 oz of 1.0 kcal/ml nutritional supplement (n = 19) versus weekly nutritional counselling (n = 18). | |
| Outcomes | Energy intake*. | |
| Notes | Data obtained from authors. | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Coin toss used to randomise participants. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Clinical outcomes | High risk | None measured. |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Functional outcomes | High risk | None measured. |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Nutritional outcomes | High risk | Paper states that assessments were made by the nurse and dietitian that implemented the intervention. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | 8 participants lost to follow up, 6 in the experimental group and 2 in the control group. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All specified outcomes reported but presented in a figure and so not in a format usable for meta‐analysis. Mean change (SD) in energy intake obtained from authors. |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Baseline variables given, the supplement group weighed less and received less radiotherapy. |