McCarthy 1999.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial. Duration 4 weeks. | |
Participants | 40 adults (mean (SD) age treatment group 59.6 years (9.6 years), mean (SD) age control group 55.6 years (14 years) beginning a course of curative radiotherapy for stage 1 or 2 cancer. Nutritional status of participants unclear. 8 participants lost to follow up, 6 in the experimental group and 2 in the control group. |
|
Interventions | Weekly nutritional counselling to maintain recommended dietary intake of calories and protein plus 8 oz of 1.0 kcal/ml nutritional supplement (n = 19) versus weekly nutritional counselling (n = 18). | |
Outcomes | Energy intake*. | |
Notes | Data obtained from authors. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Coin toss used to randomise participants. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not discussed. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Clinical outcomes | High risk | None measured. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Functional outcomes | High risk | None measured. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Nutritional outcomes | High risk | Paper states that assessments were made by the nurse and dietitian that implemented the intervention. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | 8 participants lost to follow up, 6 in the experimental group and 2 in the control group. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All specified outcomes reported but presented in a figure and so not in a format usable for meta‐analysis. Mean change (SD) in energy intake obtained from authors. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Baseline variables given, the supplement group weighed less and received less radiotherapy. |