Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 7;2015(11):CD006876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub4

Comparison 1.

Electromechanical and robotic assisted training versus all other intervention

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Activities of daily living at the end of intervention phase 18 717 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.37 [0.11, 0.64]
2 Activities of daily living at the end of intervention phase: subgroup analysis comparing acute and chronic phase 18 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Participants treated in the acute and subacute phase of their stroke (within 3 months) 8 320 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.53 [0.09, 0.96]
2.2 Participants treated in the chronic phase (more than 3 months) 10 397 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.66 [‐0.17, 1.49]
3 Arm function at the end of intervention phase 31 1078 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.35 [0.18, 0.51]
4 Arm muscle strength at the end of intervention phase 16 568 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.36 [0.01, 0.70]
5 Acceptability: drop‐outs during intervention period 34 1160 Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.00 [‐0.02, 0.03]