Burgar 2011
| Methods | Prospective, single‐blinded RCT Method of randomisation: stratified random number table | |
| Participants | Country: USA Sample size: 54 participants (19 in the first treatment group, 17 in the second treatment group, and 18 in the control group) Inclusion criteria: primary diagnosis of stroke Exclusion criteria: people were excluded if they exhibited upper limb joint pain that restricted normal movement, had absent proprioception at the elbow or shoulder joints, or scored less than 22 on the Mini Mental State Examination. People with cardiovascular, orthopaedic, or neurological conditions that would have precluded exercise in short‐duration, moderate‐workload trials were also excluded |
|
| Interventions | 3 groups:
|
|
| Outcomes | Outcomes were recorded at baseline, just after completion of training (after 3 weeks), and 6 months later (follow‐up)
*The strength of 14 shoulder and elbow muscle groups was assessed by performing manual muscle testing of isolated joint actions and applying the MRC Motor Power grading scale (0 to 5) with a maximum possible score of 70 (scapular abduction/upward rotation, scapular elevation, adduction, adduction/depression, adduction/downward rotation, flexion, extension, abduction, horizontal adduction, horizontal abduction, external rotation, internal rotation, elbow flexion, elbow extension) |
|
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random‐number table |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear, not reported |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | A second therapist at each site, blinded to group assignment, performed a clinical assessment battery just before study initiation, just after completion of training, and again at the 6‐month follow‐up |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |