Chang 2012
| Methods | RCT Method of randomisation: not stated Blinding of outcome assessors: not stated Adverse events: not stated by the authors Deaths: not stated by the authors Drop‐outs: 3 (2 in experimental group, 1 in control group) ITT analysis: not described | |
| Participants | Country: Republic of Korea 48 allocated participants (24 in treatment group, 24 in control group) 38 participants were non‐ambulatory at start of study Mean age: 58 years Inclusion criteria: first‐ever stroke, stroke onset within 1 month, supratentorial lesion, age > 20 years and < 65 years, not an independent ambulator (FAC < 2) and ability to cooperate during exercise testing Exclusion criteria: people who met criteria for absolute and relative contraindications to exercise testing established by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) were excluded. Also, people who met contraindications for Lokomat therapy or musculoskeletal disease involving the lower limbs, such as severe painful arthritis, osteoporosis, or joint contracture and other neurological diseases, were also excluded | |
| Interventions | 2 arms:
|
|
| Outcomes | Outcomes were recorded at baseline and after training
|
|
| Notes | This study describes the same study protocol and participants as described in the study Kim 2008 but provides some further explanations of participant characteristics; the ID Chang 2012 replaces therefore the ID Kim 2008 | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of randomisation is unclear |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of concealment is unclear |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear |