Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 25;2013(7):CD006185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub3

Husemann 2007

Methods RCT Method of randomisation: opaque envelopes, stratified by side of paresis and etiology Blinding of outcome assessors: yes Adverse events: 2 (1 in experimental group, 1 in control group) Deaths: none Drop‐outs: 2 (1 in experimental group, 1 in control group) ITT analysis: not provided for all drop‐outs
Participants Country: Germany 32 participants (17 in treatment group, 15 in control group) Non‐ambulatory at start of study Mean age: not provided by the authors Inclusion criteria: not provided by the authors Exclusion criteria: not provided by the authors
Interventions 2 arms:
  • Robotic gait trainer (Lokomat), 30 minutes per weekday for 4 weeks

  • Conventional physiotherapy, 30 minutes per day for 4 weeks


Both groups received additional 30 minutes of physiotherapy daily
Outcomes Outcomes were recorded at baseline and after 4 weeks
  • FAC

Notes Published and unpublished data, provided by the authors
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random numbers generated by a computer program, block randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed opaque envelopes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Evaluating therapist blinded for group allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient reporting of attrition/exclusions to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’