Schwartz 2006
| Methods | RCT Method of randomisation: block sampling method (each block contained 6 participants: 4 experimental group and 2 control group) Blinding of outcome assessors: no Adverse events: 5 (3 in experimental group, 2 in control group) Deaths: none Drop‐outs: 11 (8 in experimental group, 3 in control group) ITT: no (stated, but 2 participants from the control group were excluded from analysis) | |
| Participants | Country: Israel 67 participants (at October 2006) (37 in treatment group, 30 in control group) Non‐ambulatory at study onset Mean age: 60 years Inclusion criteria: first stroke, until 3 months after stroke Exclusion criteria: not provided by the authors | |
| Interventions | 2 arms:
|
|
| Outcomes | Outcomes were recorded at baseline and after 3, 6 and 9 weeks
|
|
| Notes | Published and unpublished data provided by the authors | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Block sampling |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not done |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | For dichotomous outcome data, the proportion of missing outcomes compared with observed event risk enough to induce clinically relevant bias into intervention effect estimate |