Hossain 2013.
Methods | ‐ Prospective, randomised, single‐centre study. ‐ Comparison of ipratropium bromide and salbutamol vs. salbutamol alone. ‐ Method of randomisation unclear. ‐ No information on allocation concealment provided. |
|
Participants | ‐ Patients who presented to the ED with an exacerbation of asthma. ‐ Set in Bangladesh. ‐ Asthma exacerbation was defined as PEF < 50% predicted. ‐ Ages: 18 to 65 years. ‐ Asthma exacerbation severity of presenting patients reported as severe. Unable to assess estimates of asthma severity based on control hospitalisation rates due to lack of information. |
|
Interventions | ‐ Multiple doses of combination inhaled therapy. Study interventions provided via nebuliser. ‐ Group one received three doses of salbutamol alone (2.5 mg diluted in 2 mL of normal saline) every 20 minutes. ‐ Group two received three doses of ipratropium bromide (250 μg in 2 mL solution) and salbutamol (2.5 mg diluted in 2 mL of normal saline) every 20 minutes. ‐ Additional co‐interventions provided in the ED included supplemental oxygen and injection hydrocortisone. |
|
Outcomes | ‐ The primary outcome was pulmonary function at 30 and 60 minutes after nebulisation. ‐ Outcome measurements were performed as baseline, as well as 30 and 60 minutes after treatment. |
|
Notes | ‐ Study authors contacted and provided clarification of some methodology and study results. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided on how patients were randomised. Quote (p. 347): A total of 80 patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups,..." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Study did not address allocation concealment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Study did not address blinding of participants or personnel. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Study did not address blinding of outcome assessors. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient reporting of attrition/exclusions to permit judgement. Quote (p. 347): "A total 80 patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Forty (40) received Salbutamol alone (Group A) and 40 received combination Ipratropium Bromide and Salbutomol (group B)..." |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol available. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No source of funding provided. |