Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 11;2015(9):CD006459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006459.pub3

Comparison 5. Paraesthesia by subgroups.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 By type of intervention/comparison 6 471 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.42 [0.23, 0.76]
1.1 peripheral nerve stimulation 5 431 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.46 [0.25, 0.86]
1.2 landmark technique 1 40 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.16 [0.02, 1.50]
2 By type of nerve block/approach 6 471 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.42 [0.23, 0.76]
2.1 axillary brachial plexus 3 250 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.58 [0.19, 1.79]
2.2 infraclavicular brachial plexus 3 221 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.19, 0.76]