Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 11;2015(9):CD006459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006459.pub3

Strub 2011.

Methods RCT, parallel design
Participants 141 patients scheduled for hand surgery distal to the elbow with and estimated duration < 2 hrs
Excluded: Those that declined to give informed consent, had known allergy to any anaesthetic substance, an infection in region of injection site, severe coagulopathy, pathological enlargement of axillary lymph nodes, those who had had previous surgery on the axilla
Interventions Ultrasound (n = 70) vs landmark technique (n = 71)
Axillary brachial plexus block; dose of 20 ml LA deposited behind artery next to radial nerve; 10 ml LA then injected around mediocranial median nerve and mediocaudal ulnar nerve
Ultrasound: cross‐section of axillary artery is imaged. Individual nerves are then identified. Cannula introduced under US. 20 G 105” bevelled needle. LA injected around all 4 nerves individually starting with radial nerve. Aim of infiltration is to see a circular perineural spread of the fluid in the ultrasound image. Bupivacaine hydrochloride (5 mg/ml) with 0.5% adrenaline and mepivacaine hydrochloride (10 mg/ml) in a ratio of 1:1
Neurostimulation: Anatomic landmarks used for orientation. Needle inserted in space between axillary artery and coracobrachial muscle, near to axillary fold. Needle at an angle to skin of 50 ‐ 90°, inserted past facial click and advanced cranially, caudally or transarterially past axillary artery
Outcomes
  1. Supplementation rate (blocks which required additional anaesthesia, analgesics or GA)

  2. Complications

  3. Time to perform block (no definition)

Notes Training had been given to those conducting the ultrasound technique; baseline of 10 procedures with US before study, or 300 in conventional technique
Not possible to combine data for Time to perform block or Onset time as no standard deviation reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias):Complications High risk Surgeon not blinded
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias): time outcomes High risk Surgeon not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): adequacy of block, supplementation of block High risk “No blinding” reported at end of discussion
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): Complications High risk “No blinding” reported at end of discussion
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): time outcomes High risk “No blinding” reported at end of discussion
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No apparent losses
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Published protocol not sought
Baseline characteristics Low risk All comparable
Funding sources Low risk None
Operator expertise High risk Surgeon with limited experience (10 previous attempts) using ultrasound technique