Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 11;2015(9):CD006459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006459.pub3

Van Geffen 2009.

Methods RCT, parallel design
Participants 40 ASA I ‐ III patients undergoing surgery of foot or ankle with distal sciatic nerve block in popliteal fossa
Exclusion criteria: Patient refusal, pre‐existing neuropathy, kidney or liver disease, pregnancy, skin infection at site of needle insertion and inability to communicate
Interventions Ultrasound (n = 20) versus nerve stimulation (n = 20)
Distal sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa with lignocaine 1.5% with adrenaline 5 µg/ml – at discretion of anaesthetist, min of 25 ml and max of 40 ml
Ultrasound: with 7 ‐ 13 MHz 38 mm linear probe (Sonosite); endpoint ‐ visualization of LA distribution around nerve
Nerve stimulation (HNS 11, Braun): 0.1 msec duration, frequency 2 Hz; starting current 1.0 mA. Initial current reduced until responses maintained with minimum of 0.2 mA and max 0.5 mA
Outcomes
  1. Adequacy of block (defined as "surgical block success")

  2. Block performance time (interval between first needle insertion and its removal at end of injection of local anaesthetic)

  3. Number of attempts

  4. Pain during puncture

Notes Anaesthetists had extensive clinical experience with nerve stimulation guided popliteal sciatic nerve blocks but no experience with ultrasound guidance block
Some participants also given saphenous nerve block if tourniquet required for surgery; no details in results of those that were given additional block
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Described as randomized using sealed envelopes. No further detail
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias):adequacy of block, need for supplementation High risk Anaesthestists not blinded
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias): time outcomes High risk Anaesthestists not blinded
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias): Patient discomfort High risk Anaesthestists not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): adequacy of block, supplementation of block Unclear risk No details of who assessed this. Assume anaesthetist?
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): time outcomes Low risk Assessor blinded to block technique
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): Patient discomfort Low risk Assessor blinded to block technique
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No apparent losses
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Published protocol not sought
Baseline characteristics Low risk Age, weight, height, ASAI‐III, gender, type of surgery. All comparable
Funding sources High risk Funding from dept sources. Study equipment supported was provided from Sonosite Inc, Bothell, WA, USA
Operator expertise High risk Anaesthetists had extensive clinical experience with nerve stimulation guided popliteal sciatic nerve blocks but no experience with ultrasound guidance block