Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 30;2015(11):CD011975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011975

Kozlowski 2007 GC.

Clinical features and settings Routine referral.
Participants 6906 participants with complete outcome data.
Germany ‐ gynaecologists practices.
January 2000‐December 2003.
Pregnant women.
Median maternal age 32 years (15‐48 years), 26.4% ≥ 35 years.
11‐14 weeks' gestation.
Study design Cohort study.
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 19 cases.
Reference standard: karyotyping or follow‐up to birth.
Index and comparator tests Maternal age.
First trimester NT (FMF certified gynaecologists).
First trimester free ßhCG and PAPP‐A (Kryptor analyser, Brahms).
Risk cut‐point 1:300.
Follow‐up Data on pregnancy outcome were obtained by contacting the patient or their general gynaecologist. Women without complete outcome data (36%) were excluded from the study.
Aim of study To evaluate and compare the screening performance for fetal trisomy 21 in the first trimester of pregnancy in general gynaecologists practices and specialised centres for prenatal care in Germany.
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population.
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth.
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All women received a reference standard.
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results.
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test.
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results.
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results.
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice.
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements.
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests Yes 146 women (including 11 with Down's syndrome) excluded as results could not be assigned to gynaecologists or prenatal centre group.