Muller 2003a.
Clinical features and settings | Routine screening. | |
Participants | 5694 pregnant women who had first trimester NT and biochemical testing. France ‐ 9 centres serving 12 maternity units. January 1998‐June 2001. Singleton pregnancies. Maternal age not reported. 11‐13 weeks' gestation. |
|
Study design | Retrospective cohort study. | |
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Down's syndrome: 26 cases. Reference standards: invasive testing (offered to women with high NT measurement) or follow‐up to birth. |
|
Index and comparator tests | Maternal age. First trimester NT in 98% of patients (methods not specified. 60 sonographers ‐ 2 trained by FMF, who trained 30 in turn. 8 externally trained in France. 20 were self‐taught. Machines not specified). Frozen serum tested for: First trimester PAPP‐A (99% of patients), free ßhCG 99% of patients and AFP (93% of patients) (time‐resolved fluorescent assay, Perkin‐Elmer Life sciences). Risk cut‐point 1:250. |
|
Follow‐up | Data from the French national screening programme used for follow‐up at birth. 211 women (3.7%) who did not return after NT or were found to be > 14 weeks were excluded. It is unclear how many patients had follow‐up to birth. | |
Aim of study | Prospective study of NT and retrospective evaluation of serum (in same patient population) to evaluate whether or not to move the national French Down's screening programme to a first trimester programme. | |
Notes | FMF methods ‐ some self‐taught sonographers. | |
Table of Methodological Quality | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
Representative spectrum? All tests | Yes | Routine screening of typical pregnant population. |
Acceptable reference standard? All tests | Yes | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth. |
Partial verification avoided? All tests | Unclear | Unclear if all women received a reference standard. |
Differential verification avoided? All tests | No | Choice of reference standard depended on index test results. |
Incorporation avoided? All tests | Yes | Reference standard was independent of the index test. |
Reference standard results blinded? All tests | No | Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results. |
Index test results blinded? All tests | Yes | Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results. |
Relevant clinical information? All tests | Yes | Information available as would be in standard clinical practice . |
Uninterpretable results reported? All tests | Yes | Women with NT too small to measure assumed to have NT of < 0.5 mm. |
Withdrawals explained? All tests | Yes | Women failing to return or who more than 14 weeks' pregnant were excluded (214). |