Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 30;2015(11):CD011975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011975

Muller 2003a.

Clinical features and settings Routine screening.
Participants 5694 pregnant women who had first trimester NT and biochemical testing.
France ‐ 9 centres serving 12 maternity units.
January 1998‐June 2001.
Singleton pregnancies.
Maternal age not reported.
11‐13 weeks' gestation.
Study design Retrospective cohort study.
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 26 cases.
Reference standards: invasive testing (offered to women with high NT measurement) or follow‐up to birth.
Index and comparator tests Maternal age.
First trimester NT in 98% of patients (methods not specified. 60 sonographers ‐ 2 trained by FMF, who trained 30 in turn. 8 externally trained in France. 20 were self‐taught. Machines not specified).
Frozen serum tested for:
First trimester PAPP‐A (99% of patients), free ßhCG 99% of patients and AFP (93% of patients) (time‐resolved fluorescent assay, Perkin‐Elmer Life sciences).
Risk cut‐point 1:250.
Follow‐up Data from the French national screening programme used for follow‐up at birth. 211 women (3.7%) who did not return after NT or were found to be > 14 weeks were excluded. It is unclear how many patients had follow‐up to birth.
Aim of study Prospective study of NT and retrospective evaluation of serum (in same patient population) to evaluate whether or not to move the national French Down's screening programme to a first trimester programme.
Notes FMF methods ‐ some self‐taught sonographers.
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population.
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth.
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Unclear Unclear if all women received a reference standard.
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results.
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test.
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results.
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results.
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice .
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests Yes Women with NT too small to measure assumed to have NT of < 0.5 mm.
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests Yes Women failing to return or who more than 14 weeks' pregnant were excluded (214).