Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 12;2015(2):CD008349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub3

Kiper 2011

Methods RCT
Participants Recruited from an Institute of Rehabilitation, Italy
80 participants: 40 intervention, 40 control
Inclusion criteria: diagnosis of stroke within 1 year of enrolment and score of > 24/30 on the Mini Mental State Examination
Exclusion criteria: clinical evidence of cognitive impairment, apraxia, neglect, language disturbance, complete paralysis of the upper extremity, upper limb sensory disorders or post‐traumatic injury, which prevented the execution of exercises
Mean (SD) age: 64 (16.4) years
58% male
Time since onset of stroke: mean (SD) 5.7 (3.5) months
Interventions Virtual reality intervention: reinforced feedback in virtual environment (RFVE). Participants in the intervention group received 1 hour of traditional rehabilitation and 1 hour of RFVE. The RFVE involved sitting in front of a wall screen grasping a sensorised real object (ball, disc or cube) with the affected hand. The target objects were displayed on the wall screen. The physiotherapist created a sequence of virtual tasks that the participant had to perform on his workstation (e.g. pouring water from a glass, using a hammer)
Control intervention: traditional neuromotor rehabilitation including postural control, exercises for hand pre‐configuration, manipulative and functional skills, proximal‐distal exercises
Sessions were 1 hour a day, 5 days a week for 4 weeks (approximately 20 hours total)
Outcomes Outcomes recorded at baseline and post‐intervention
Upper limb function outcomes: Fugl Meyer
Activity limitation outcomes: Functional Independence Measure
Other outcomes: Modified Ashworth Scale (spasticity)
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated sequence
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Opaque envelopes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Masked to allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No drop outs
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk